Chemtrails

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal. By John Winston: johfw@mlode.com

Subject: What Is In Chemtrails?
Oct. 7, 2011.

A person on the internet recently asked me what is in Chemtrials.
Here is an answer to the question.

Chemtrails Exposed

Comments
Join The Exclusive Intel Hub Mailing List!

The Intel Hub
By Peter K-rby
October 10, 2011
Related: Exposed: S-cret P-esidential Chemtrail Budget Uncovered,
C-ngress Exceeds Billions To Spray Populace Like Roaches.
According to all U-ited States federal g-vernment organziations,
chemtrails do not exist and/or are a c-nspiracy theory. They claim
that the white lines in the sky stretching from horizon to horizon are
normal jet contrails.
Somehow, I assume using theoretical physics, these contrails can
first appear as small white lines high in the sky then, over the course
of hours, expand as they float down to earth first creating small
clouds and finally a haze. This is exactly what is happening.
They were spraying us something fierce today above San
Francisco. They often do it before a weather front is coming in.
There were lines in every direction, a big X in the sky and then
the inevitable haziness.
Everybody saw it. Many people knew what it was. Many do not
want to realize it, so they may never. If you want to be a good
s-ave, I’m sure you will bend over and take the easy way out.
I do not appeal to the sla-e rather I appeal to the person who
has the courage to stand up for humanity and accept themselves
as the only authority. I suggest that you read the following
expos and ask the tough questions about what OUR go-ernment
says is NOT happening.
A typical chemtrail appears as a white line in the sky. These
lines become diffuse as they float down to earth. Heavy spraying
creates a thick haze over vast areas.

Often, in certain areas of the country, you will see grid patterns
in the sky formed by chemtrails. If you watch closely, you will
see that these white lines in the sky come from passing jets.
The fact that these exhausts persist means that they are of
particulate matter. Contrails are unaduIterated and typically
disappear within 2 minutes while chemtrails can linger for hours.
The word chemtrail is derived from the word contrail. At the
time of this writing, chemtrails are appearing almost every
day above San Rafael and San Francisco. By most accounts,
chemtrail spraying became nationally prevalent in the mid
1990.
There is a p-litical grouping among affected nations; almost
all are N-TO members. Interestingly, there is reportedly no
spraying in South America, China or Russia, etc..

Circumstantial Evidence:

Geoengineersí propose spraying megatons of toxins into the
atmosphere utilizing jet airplanes. They say it can save us from
global warming. They don’t admit that it is currently
happening, they just say it might be good.
Many people calling themselves geoengineers have appeared
on television and Internet broadcasts proposing this activity.
Geoengineering is similar to cloud seeding (which also pollutes
our environment), but it is something new in that different
materials are disbursed and it is on a much bigger scale.
The Father of the Hy-rogen B-mb, Edward T-ller is widely
recognized for his early work in the field. U-ited States
Science Czar John Holdren and University of Calgary professor
David Keith are currently the most prominent proponents. Mr.
Holdren co-authored a 1977 book called Ecoscience in which
he openly advocates population reduction.
The Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER),
an organization funded by Mr. Bill G-tes, gives grants to the
University of Calgary. FICER proposes adding reflective
aerosols (small particles suspended in air) to the stratosphere
Mr. Bill Gat-s is a population reduction advocate.
Many Uni-ed States patents describe how substances can be
disbursed through airplane spray nozzles. One of the the most
important patents is U.S. Patent #5003186 Stratospheric
W-lsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warmingí» which was
filed by the H-ghes Ai-craft Corporation in 1991. The Hu-hes
Aircraft Corporation is now a division of R-ytheon.
Another is U.S. Patent #3899144 Powder Contrail Generation»
assigned to the Uni-ed States N-vy which was filed on July 22,
1974.
The 1996 U.S. Air F-rce research paper Weather as a Force
Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 was produced by the
Department of D-fense and written as a study designed to
comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Fo-ce.
This report explains how spraying stuff into the atmosphere with
airplanes is good and how our mil-tary might go about doing this.
The Un-ted Nations backed Intergover-mental Panel on Climate
Change issued a 1999 report with a cover photo of three jet
planes flying in formation and emitting trails entitled Aviation
and the Global Atmosphere. This report contained chapters titled,
Aviation-Produced Aerosols and Cloudiness and Modeling the
Chemical Composition of the Future Atmosphere.
The Council on F-reign Relations has issued many publications
about geoengineering. Their 2008 paper entitled Unilateral
Geoengineering: Non-technical Briefing Notes for a Workshop
at the Council on Fo-eign Relations proposes spraying fine
particles into the stratosphere.
The U.K. R-yal Society published a 2009 report titled
Geoengineering the Climate: Science, G-vernance and
Uncertainty in which they propose geoengineering and
state, A wide range of types of particles could be released into
the stratosphere with the objective of scattering sunlight
back to space.
The British Ho-se of Commons collaborated with the Uni-ed
States House of Representatives Science and Technology
Committee to release a report on March 10, 2010 entitled The
Regulation of Geoengineering in which they advocate the
release of large quantities of aerosols into the atmosphere.
Aurora Flight Sciences published a 2010 cost analysis study
prepared under contract to the University of C-lgary entitled
geoengineering Cost Analysisí» which stated: ░The goal of this
study is to use engineering design and cost analysis to determine
the feasibility and cost of a delivering material to the
stratosphere for solar radiation management (SRM). [sic] In
this report, the authors write about utilizing different kinds of
aircraft, including blimps, to spray stuff into the atmosphere.
Ted Gun-erson (former head of the Los Angeles, Dallas and
Memphis F-I) claims to have witnessed huge, unmarked
chemtrail spraying planes on the ground at the Lin-oln,
Nebraska Air National G-ard facilities. He also says that
chemtrail spraying planes operate out of Fort Sill O-lahoma.
A name that comes up a lot is Evergreen A-iation. They are
a private aviation services company based in McMinn-ille,
Oregon. They have a website. They describe themselves
as, a global leader providing quality and reliable total aviation
support services.
They also have extensive operations at the Pinal Ai-park in
Mar-na, Arizona. Pinal Air-ark and Evergreen Aviation have
extensive ties to the CI-. During the Vietnam W-r, Pinal
Airpa-k served as the base of operations for the known -IA
front companies Air Am-rica, Air Asia and Intermountain
Air-ines. In 1975, Intermountain Airli-es was bought by
Evergreen Av-ation.
The 2008 feature film Toxic Skies starring Anne He-he is a
fictional drama involving chemtrails.
Local professional news reporters around the nation have
investigated and/or made mention of the phenomenon many
times.
There has been formal discussion of chemtrails in the New
Ze-land Parliament.
Multi-term Ari-ona state senator Karen J-hnson has been an
outspoken critic.
U.S. co-gressman Dennis Kuc-nich used the word chemtrails
in proposed national legislation. The word appeared in the
Space Preservation Act of 2001. On September 10, 2002 the
City Council of B-rkeley, California, in support of Congressman
Kuc-nich’s Space Preservation Act, enacted Resolution #61744,
declaring the space 60 kilometers and above Ber-eley as a
space-based we-pons free zone.
On September 14th, Congressman Kucin-ch was officially
presented the resolution by Coun-ilmember Dona Sp-ing, who
initiated the resolution before 700 people in Wheeler
Auditorium. The audience gave Kuc-nich and Spri-g a standing
ovation.

Victoria, British C-umbia has declared itself a No-Fly Zone for
chemtrail aircraft.
Mar-n County Board of Supervisors, District 1 Represe-tative
Susan Adam- has voiced interest in chemtrail legislation,
stating, I will continue to monitor your efforts and if there is
fe-eral legislation or regulation being considered which the
county can send a letter of support for, please let me know.

Part 1.

John Winston. johnfw@mlode.com

rom Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Subject: What Is In Chemtrails? Part 2.
Oct. 17, 2011.

This tells what the Chemtrails look like.

………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………

Third S-natorial District California State Senator Mark L-no recognizes
chemtrails. He responded to my letter about chemtrails by stating, Thank
you for writing to share the information on chemtrails. I appreciate your
taking the time to voice your concerns regarding this important issue.
As we begin to learn more about chemtrails and begin to have more in
depth conversations about their use, I will keep the information you have
forwarded in mind.
There is a global grass roots p-litical movement against chemtrails. There
are hundreds of thousands of independent eyewitness accounts on the
Internet. Millions of people are already fully chemtrail aware. People
from all walks of life around the world have come forward and spoken
out against chemtrails. I have documentation of airline pilots, p-lice
officers, U.S. Marines, air traffic controllers, a senior Air Traffic
Control
manager, Air F-rce tanker crews, scientists and more speaking up.
Accounts:
This section is comprised of excerpts from the 2004 book Chemtrails
Confirmedí by William T-omas (Bridger House Publishers
ISBN 1-893157-10-5). William Th-mas is an award winning Canadian
journalist. Thomas writing and photography have appeared in more
than 50 publications in eight countries, including translations into
French, Dutch and Japanese.
His editorial commentaries have appeared in The Globe and Mail, The
Toronto Star, The Vancouver Sun and Times-Colonist newspapers.
A frequent radio talk-show guest, William Tho-as has also appeared
on the CBC and New Zealand’s national television. He currently lives
and works among the Gulf Islands of B-itish Columbia.

It was nearly noon when S.T. B-endt awoke and entered the kitchen
of her country home in Parsonfield, Maine. As she poured her first
cup of coffee, the late night reporter for WMWV radio could not guess
that her life was minutes away from drastic change.
Her partner Lou Au-uchont was already up, puzzling over what he had
seen in the sky a half hour before. The fat puffy plumes arching up
over the horizon were unlike any contrail he had ever seen, even during
his hitch in the N-vy.
Lou got up and looked. What kind of clouds run exactly side-by-side
in a straight line? He wondered. It’s just too perfect to happen
naturally. When he said he wasn’t sure, S.T. stopped smiling and
went outside.
Looking up towards the southeast over West Pond, she spotted the
first jet. A second jet was laying billowing white banners to the north.
Both aircraft appeared to be over 30,000 ft. Turning her gaze due
west, Bren-t saw two more lines extending over the horizon. She
called Lou. Within 45 minutes the couple counted 30 jets.
This isn’t right, S.T. thought. We just don’t have that kind of air traffic
here. While Lou kept counting, she went inside and started calling
airports. One official she reached was guarded but friendly. He had
relatives in West Pond.
The Air Traffic Control manager told Brendt her sighting was unusual.
His radars showed nine commercial jets during the same 45-minuite
span. From her location, he said, she should have been able to see
one plane.
And the other 29? The F-A official confided off the record that he
had been ordered by higher civil authority to re-route inbound
European airliners away from a m-litary exercise in the area. Of
course they wouldn’t give me any of the particulars and I don’t ask,
he explained. I just do my job.
Excited and puzzled by this information, S.T. and Lou got into their
car and headed down Route 160. Looking in any direction they
could see 5 or 6 jets flying over 30,000 ft. Never in the dozen years
they’d lived in rural Maine, had they seen so much aerial activity.
As a former U.S. Na-y intelligence courier, Aubuch-nt was used
to large-scale milit-ry exercises. But he told S.T. he had never
seen anything this big.
It looked like an i-vasion, he later recounted. Another driver
almost went off the road as he leaned over his dashboard trying to
look up. As they passed, he acknowledged them with a nod.
As far as they could see stretched line after line. Two giant grids
were especially blatant. In stead of dissipating like normal
contrails, these sky trails grew wider and wider and began to merge.
Looking towards the sun, Aub-chont saw what looked like an oil
and water mixture reflecting a prismatic band of colors.
At approx. 3:55 they headed home to Parsonfield. They (the jets)
were still up there. What’s worse is that these grids were now
merging to the point of greying their beautiful skies. By 5:30 their
beautiful day had turned dingy and hazy like air pollution and the
sunset was dirty. Lou remembers seeing the last jets at about
5:15 pm leaving chemtrails. They were spaced further apart then
the earlier jets.
Richard D-an called back. After receiving S.T.’s message, the
assistant W-WV news di-ector had gone outside with other news
staff and counted 370 lines in skies usually devoid of aerial activity.
The most jets they could see at any one time was 17.

There is plenty of pattern and precedent for unannounced
biowarfare experiments on the American public. Two
cong-essional investigations in 1977 and 1994, as well as
recently declassified British de-ense documents, detail five
decades of open air testing that spread biological w-rfare
simulants from spray-equipped ships and aircraft to hundreds
of cities and millions of unsuspecting taxpayers across the
U.S., Canada and the U.K.
Even as aerial a-omic detonations were being conducted
upwind of U.S. cities to test the effects of fallout on
unsuspecting residents, air-borne biowa-fare tests began in
earnest in I957 and 1958 when a cargo plane criss-crossed
the country, spraying highly toxic zinc cadmium sulfide chemicals.
A U.S. Ar-y report states, Virtually, the whole country of the
Un-ted States was covered with this material.
Prof. Leonard C0le testified at the first co-gressional
investigation into large area bio-arfare experiments. The
author of Clouds of S-crecy described how:
The plane would take off from the Canadian border, and fly
slowly down to the Gulf of Mexico. These materials would
be spread, and were found to be landing as far away as New
York State. So you know that, as the air would push the
zinc cadmium particles around, most of the people who were
residents of the Uni-ed States during that time were inhaling
at least some of the zinc cadmium sulfide. And the cadmium
in that compound was clearly known then to be toxic, even
in small amounts.
Con-ress also learned that in 1953 the U.S. Arm- sprayed
fluorescent particles containing carcinogenic cadmium sulfide
over 25-square-block areas of downtown St. Louis, including
what the ar-y called a slum area. The U.S. Public Health
Service’s toxic chemical registry warns that cadmium sulfide
can lead to lung c-ncer, high blood pressure and damage to
the kidneys, lung, liver as well as damaging the nervous,
reproductive and immune systems.

A story published by WorldNetDaily in 2001 C Californians
Concerned Over Chemtrails was one of the first to take
eyewitnesses seriously.
Reporter Lance Li-dsay interviewed David Og-esby. Just after
sun-down two months previously, the World W-r II veteran
spotted nearly a dozen white trails, dissipating slowly over
his home. The trails formed a grid pattern, Ogles-y told Linds-y.
Some stretched from horizon to horizon; some began abruptly
and others ended abruptly. They hung in the air for an
extended period of time and gradually widened into wispy
clouds, resembling spider webs. I counted at least 11 different
trails.
Lin-say also examined dozens of photos taken over l2-months
by Paula G-ick. Her father Gene S-imer served four years as
a radar technician during the Korean Wa-. The retired U.S. Air
F-rce sergeant does not believe the patterns over his
Coarsegold home are normal contrails.
l was talking to my dad, Gli-k remembers, and he said, They’re
gridding us up here. I thought, Yeah, right dad. Sure they are.
I didn’t believe him.
Four months after moving from Ventura to Coarsegold, Gl-ck
had to reassess her father’s assessment. I had to watch them
do it, -lick told Lin-say. And as I watched them everyday doing
it, it became apparent that we were being sprayed. And so I
had to believe. I saw what was normal and I saw what was
abnormal.
Shi–er contacted the Mil-tary Operation Control at Trav-s Air
Fo-ce Base, which controls all mi-itary operations in Central
California. S-imer asked the colonel to identify three planes
flying over his home at that very moment. What would you say
if I said there are three aircraft up there right now? Shim-r
asked. Are they there?
The colonel replied, No. They are not there.
Na-y operations told Shi-er there were no operations at all.
The flight-control office at Fresno Yosemite In-ernational Airport
said no flight plans had been filed.
But lra Plumber is a retired lieutenant co-onel in the U.S. Air
For-e who regularly watches the sky over his Coarsegold home.
Several times a week, he sees planes emitting significant sky
trails that do not appear to be normal contrails, Plumber says.

Part 2.

John Winston. johnfw@mlode.com

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Subject: What Is In Chemtrails? Part 3.
Oct. 18, 2011.

This mentions a rat p-ison that is in Chemtrails.

………………………………………………..
………………………………………………..

As L-ndsay chronicles:
One morning, about two years ago, S-imer spotted a long, thin string
resembling a spider web floating in the sky, he said. It was about 20 feet
in length and could only be seen in the reflection of the sun. He looked
up, saw trails, and then saw something that appeared to be a glob of
foam falling from the sky. It came floating down, free-floating, Sh-mer
says. I caught it with a spatula, scooped it off the ground, and I watched
it as it shrank. It was about the size of my fist when it first started.
It
looked like a cross between soap bubbles and cotton candy. He placed
the substance in a plastic bag and kept it. It is now about the size of
his thumbnail, he says. It has hardened now appearing to be made of
plastic. He did not have it lab tested. He doesn’t have enough faith
in any lab to give them his only sample, he says. He believes it is
probably polymer.
~
Dave D-ckie’s World Landscapes company performs contract landscape
work for the City of E-monton. Some contracts require us to utilize the
services of environmental labs for soil tests, says Di-kie. Recent soils
analysis have come back with a high EC rating 4:l (toxic) and we’ve
had some soil sources rejected of course they did not meet
specifications.
In an interview with me on Nov. 23, 2002, Di-kie explained that city
landscape crews were finding widespread nutrient deficiency soils
could cause severe problems for plant life including trees.
Wait, I interrupted. Aluminum sucks nutrients from the soil.
No question answered this soil expert. Moreover, added Dic-ie when
measuring the electrical conductivity in Ed-onton soil sample city
specifications call for a reading no higher than 1.
Dickie’s crews are now finding readings from 4.6 as high as 7.
The chlorosis condition resulting from this drastically high electrical
conductivity in soil was impacting their landscaping business, Dick-e
explained. We were not able to determine the cause of the EC
[electrical conductivity], and many reasons are possible.
Presuming that unusual metal content in the soil could be causing
the high readings, Dickie obtained samples of a fresh snowfall in
sterile containers and took them to NorWest Labs in Edmonton. As
explained, Our most recent snowfall was tested for aluminum and
barium and we were not surprised with the results. You’ve said
it all and this just substantiates some of your claims.
In Nov. 2002, lab tests of snow samples collected by the city of
Edm-nton, Alberta between Nov. 8, confirmed elevated levels of
aluminum and barium. NorWest Labs lab report #336566 dated
Nov. 14, 2002 found: aluminum levels at 0.148F milligrams/litre
and barium levels of 0.006 milligrams/litre.

Because aluminum is ubiquitous in the environment, and its
chemistry depends on soil pH and mineralogical composition, it
is difficult to provide generalized estimates of natural background
concentrations.
But according to Dicki-, the N-rWest Lab techs told him, That’s
interesting. Elevated levels of aluminum and barium are not
usually found in Alberta precipitation.
It may not prove that the aluminum came from atmospheric
programs, -ickie admits. However we are going to sample
precipitation from various areas within a 40 mile radius of the
City of E-monton to determine aluminum/barium within
precipitation.
Di-kie says it’s simple to test for aluminum and barium in soil
samples. Labs typically charge about $15 for these tests. I
suggested he add quartz to the list of chemtrail fallout
components to check for. In Espanola, quartz predominated
rainfall samples, which also showed hazardous levels of aluminum.
Though it must be emphasized that neither Di-kie nor Nor-est
Labs are making any claims regarding these early test results,
the correlation of known chemtrail chemistry with Edmo-ton’s
soil samples is compelling.
This was hot. But imagine my shock when Dic-ie told me that
he regularly visits Air T-affic Control at the Ed-onton municipal
airport and watches the chemplanes making repeated passes
over the city!
I’ve been a plane spotter all my life, Dic-ie explained. Blessed
with good friends at work in the tower, he has watched
radar-identified KC-135s on many occasions.
Last Father’s Day (2002), Dic-ie and an excited group of 12
year-olds watched two sorties by two KC-135s. Petro 011
and Petro 012 were tracked by radar as HA (High Altitude)
targets flying at 34,000 and 36,000 feet one to the south, and
one to the north of the city.
Both U-AF tankers had flown south out of Alaska. As Dic-ie, the
kids and the controllers watched, the big jets began making
patterns over Edmonton circuits the controllers called it. The
Stratotankers were working alone in commanded airspace
from which all other aircraft were excluded.
And they were leaving chemtrails.
The signature is significant, commented one radar operator,
referring to a trail clearly visible on the scope extending for
miles behind the KC-135. In contrast, a JAL flight on the
display left no contrail.
Going outside, Dic-ie and several controllers scanned clear
blue skies. They easily located the KC-135 leaving its
characteristic white-plume signature. Visibility was
outstanding. They also clearly saw the JAL airliner at a
similar flight level. It left no contrail at all.
On other occasions, Dick-e has watched KC-135s on
Edmo-ton radar leaving lingering trails as low as 18,000 feet.
We see these guys up here a lot, Dicki- says radar techs
told him. The tanker flights originate in Alaska, grid the
Edm-nton area, and continue on into the States.

On Sunday Feb. 16, 2003, the mass circulation Greek
newspaper E-hnos headlined its lead story: Scientists Uneasy:
Dangerous experiments in the Greek skies.
The story’s subheading must have turned a few heads:
American aircraft are spraying the atmosphere with
chemicals with a view to creating an artificial cloud as an
antidote to the Greenhouse Effect.
The story by Giannis K-itikos described a vote by the Aigina
Island town council to ask the Greek g-vernment to explain
what is happening in the skies over Greece.
A picture taken from Chemtrails Confirmed was used to
illustrate similar phenomenon observed over Aigina without
any warning two months previously.
The translated caption read: The white trails left behind by
this tanker plane which is used normally for aerial refueling,
is not smoke but a cloud of chemicals which provide scientists
with the ability to control the climate in an entire geographic
region.
A photograph of Leonidas Ka-daras, an environmental chemist
with a master’s degree in environmental technology was paired
with a shot of Kat-aros from the Demo-ritus research centre in
Athens, with the inscription: The two scientists point out to
our correspondent the dangers to public health entailed in the
specific experiments.
A third photo showed former parliamentarian Tasia A-dreadaki
asking, Who gave permission for this spraying? The story
noted that Kats-ros had been invited to speak about chemtrails
on Greek national television a few mornings later.

The following unedited transcript is a recorded message from a
Dec. 8, 2000 call by a Canadian aviation authority from the
V-ctoria International Airport to a local resident.
St-wart was responding to a call the previous day demanding to
know why intense aerial activity had left lingering X’s, circles
and grid-like plumes over the Br-tish Columbia capitol on Dec.
6 and 7.
Ma-k, it’s Terry Ste-art, Vic-oria Airport Authority. Just calling
you back from your comment. From what I gather, it’s a m-litary
exercise; U.S. and Canadian air fo-ce exercise that’s goin on.
They wouldn’t give me any specifics on it. Hope that helps your
interest. Very odd. Thanks a lot. Bye bye now.

All this and much, much more can be found in William Th-mas
groundbreaking book “Chemtrails Confirmed” available at his
website
willthomasonline.net
Click on the bookstore tab and you will be taken to a page
where you can order a copy of “Chemtrails Confirmed”, download
an electronic copy of “Chemtrails Confirmed” or order the
“Chemtrails Confirmed” companion DVD which contains a copy
of William’s documentary video “Mystery Lines in the Sky”.
Scientific Evidence:
Hundreds of independent lab test results from around the world
too numerous to mention here have formed a consensus.
The main ingredients in chemtrails are aluminum, barium and
strontium. As you are about to see, professional scientists
have corroborated these findings.
Frances M-ngels has a Bachelor of Science in Forestry from
the International School of F-restry at M-ssoula, spent 35 years
with the U.S. F-rest Service as a wildlife biologist and worked
several years with the USDA Soil Conservation Service as a
soil conservationist.
Today he lives in Mt. Shasta, CA and works as a master gardener.
He took a sample of water from his backyard rain gauge on
Feb. 1, 2009 and submitted it to Basic Laboratory of Redding,
CA on Feb. 2, 2009. This sample showed aluminum at a level of
1010 micrograms per liter (ug/l).

Part 3.

John Winston. johnfw@mlode.com

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Subject: What Is In Chemtrails? Part 4.
Oct. 18, 2011.

I mentioned that the last posting would tell what rat po-son is in
Chemtrails. That was a mistake. It will be mentioned in this part of the
material.

…………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………

This same sample also showed barium at a level of 8 ug/l. Using the
same sample method and laboratory, he took a sample on Oct. 14,
2009 which showed aluminum at a level of 611 ug/l. The barium should
not be there in any amount. Chemtrails have been known to consist of
both barium carbonate and barium oxide. Barium carbonate is used in
rat poi-on. The normal level of aluminum in rainwater is .5 ug/l.
These samples show levels of aluminum at 2020 times and 1222 times
the normal levels. There is no heavy industry in the Mt. Shasta area.
There is no reason, other than chemtrails, for this stuff to be showing
up at these levels.
Mr. M[ngles writes on Oct. 30, 2009:

The soil scientists from the U-DA Soil Co-servation Department visited
private property east of Shasta Lake, California, on Oct. 27, 2009. Mr.
B-iley, K-mar, and O-ens tested the pH with standard federal
meters. All agreed the pH should be 5.5.
Under Douglas fir, the ph was 7.4, astoundingly basic for that habitat.
Under Poderosa pine, at the precise soil-needle interface, I would
expect a pH of 5. At that point, Bailey’s meter showed 6.5. This is
high for a microhabitat that should be very acid. Old soil surveys
indicate this soil should be very acid, around pH of 5.5.
I bought a house in Mt. Shasta old black oak/pine pasture in 2002,
tested the pH at below 6, good for vegetable gardening. It was a
major reason for purchase, and proceeded with highly acid
composting of leaves and grass to drive the pH down or at least
keep it low, as every m-ster gardener knows.
I added a touch of sulphur and avoided wood ash to insure acidity,
and proceeded to teach organic gardening courses out of my yard
through COS. The pH tests were an embarrassment because now
my garden is pH 7, sometimes higher. This is the opposite of what
should happen.
The pH meter of Jon M-Clellan proceeded to show pH in McCloud
gardens also running close to 7 or 8, which is too high for heavy
organic mulch with no ashes. General lawns were also running over
pH 7 under oaks and pines and fir trees. This is contrary to
everything I learned in college and the Soil Con-ervation Service
for 35 years.
The old data sheets say these soils should be running at a pH of 5-6.
I tested my rainwater in a plastic NWS rain gauge set high on a pole,
and got 1010 ug/l aluminum, with substantial amounts of barium and
strontium included, where it should be non-detectable. Others from
the West Coast have similar repeated results, from the Bay Area to
Washington.
The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) produced
data showing elevated levels of barium in surface water between
1988-2004. Along with other elevated readings, a sample from the
East Verde River near Payson, AZ taken on July 19, 1999 showed
barium at a level of 340 micrograms per liter (ug/l). The E-A says
the average surface water concentration of barium is 43 ug/l.
The ADEQ analyzed many water samples taken at different times
from the Nogales Wash Channel between 1993 and 2002. Among
other elevated readings, they found barium at levels of: 850 ug/l,
950 ug/l and 900 ug/l. The EP- says that 99.4% of surface water
contains 2 to 340 ug/l barium.
The ADEQ analyzed many water samples taken at different times
between 1988-2004 at the Verde River Below Horseshoe Dam.
Among many other elevated readings, a sample taken on July 19,
1990 showed barium at a level 560 ug/l and another sample taken
within a year showed barium at a level of 700 ug/l.
In June of 1996, the ADEQ analyzed water samples taken from the
Buckeye Canal. The lab report showed barium at a level of 570
parts per million.
In July of 1999, the ADEQ sampled water from the Little Colorado
River Basin and found aluminum at 150,000 ug/l or 150 mg/l or .15 g/l.
This reading is made even more interesting by the fact that in
September of 2002 AND in March of 2005, the ADEQ tested the
same river basin and found NO aluminum. What accounted for this
giant aluminum spike?
As far as water contamination is concerned, I must report that a
lot of available data which would otherwise support the chemtrail
hypothesis is misleading and unreliable.
The data to which I am referring is that which comes from the
California De-artment of Public Health Drinking Water Program
(CDPHDWP). Online, this organization is also referred to as the
California Dep-rtment of Health Sciences Drinking Water Program.
The CDPHDWP produces and distributes publicly a data CD
entitled California Drinking Water Data. This CD purports to
represent toxicology data collected from all California water
districts. The problem is that, after checking with my local water
districts and the CDPHDWP, it is apparent that the data contained
in this CD is very unreliable.
My local water districts tell me that this is because the CDPHDWP
is using an outdated data collection method. Furthermore,
websites which use this data as support for the chemtrail
hypothesis miss the point that the data CD in question
represents (and poorly so) PROCESSED DRINKING WATER when
we should be looking at UNPROCESSED or SURFACE WATER (the
water found in reservoirs).
Online you will find many graphs based on data contained in the
CDPHDWP data CD showing incredible levels of many different
toxins. All these graphs are not to be trusted without a local
water department confirmation and even in that case, the data
is not wholly pertinent.
Data produced by the California Air Res-urces Board (CARB)
shows elevated levels of chemtrail toxins. Between 1990 and
2002, CARB ambient air statewide average data shows elevated
and increasing levels of aluminum and barium. From 1990 to
2002, aluminum was detected in the range of 1500 to 2000
nanograms per cubic meter.
Barium, which between 1990 and 2002 consistently trended
upwards, reached a peak of 50.8 nanograms per cubic meter
in 2002. The CARB classifies aluminum and barium as toxic
compounds. The CARB website says, For toxics compounds,
there is generally no threshold concentration below which
the air is healthy. For toxics compounds, the greater the
quantified health risk, the more unhealthy the air is.
In other words, ANY aluminum or barium is unhealthy. There
ARE NO SAFE LEVELS except zero. Remember, these are
STATEWIDE AVERAGES. G-d forbid you might be living in
an area that increased the average.
You may ask why I am only referencing data up to 2002. This
is 2011. Where is the missing data? The answer is that data
from between 1990 and 2002 is the only data which the
CARB has widely distributed.
As far as statewide averages for ambient aluminum and
barium are concerned, these years are the only years which
their website and their California Ambient Air Quality Data
DVD show. Their Public Information Officer Dimitri S-anich
curiously refused to answer questions about the missing
data. He referred me to documents which did not address
the issue.
After discussions with staff, Mike Mi-uel, the chief of the Quality
Management Branch of the Monitoring and Laboratory Division,
wrote me saying, It is my understanding that the toxics air
monitoring network (samples collected in Summa canisters)
stoped analyzing for these compounds due to the low
concentrations. However, the PM2.5 network does analyze for
these compounds and that data was provided in the analyses
and CD. [sic]
A statewide average of barium at 50.8 nanograms per cubic
meter and aluminum at 2000 are low concentrations? Any
levels of detectable aluminum or barium have been classified
as unhealthy. The concentrations were trending upwards. They
stopped analyzing for these compounds?
I have scoured their website, written letters and made many
phone calls to the CARB and I have not heard of or seen this
missing data presented in any CD. Thankfully, other people
have been asking for this missing data as well. The organization
known as Enviro-mental Voices requested the missing data
and on September 15, 2010 they got it.
Amazingly, after data showing many years of elevated and
increasing levels of aluminum and barium, this newly produced
data showed MUCH LOWER levels. That’s good news, right?
I want to believe that everything is as it has always been!
The problem is that the newly released data contradicts the
previously released data.
Let us look at data for the year 2002 both new and old. 2002
is a year for which the CARB widely distributed data AND it
is a year for which they have provided data to only a select
few researchers such as I due to the efforts of Environm-ntal
Voices.
I will refer to the widely distributed data as the old data and
the thinly distributed data as the new data. The old data says
that in 2002 the statewide average for ambient aluminum was
1980 nanograms per cubic meter. The new data says that the
statewide average in 2002 was 67.5 nanograms per cubic meter.
The new data also says that statewide average aluminum
concentrations generally remained at this level through to 2009.
As far as barium goes, the old data says that the statewide
ambient air average barium concentration for 2002 was 50.8
nanograms per cubic meter. The new data says it was 27.5
nanograms per cubic meter. The new data says that statewide
average barium concentrations only trended lower from 2002
to 2009. Why does the new data contradict the old data?

Part 4.

John Winston. johnfw@mlode.com

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Subject: What Is In Chemtrails? Part 5 of 5. Oct. 19, 2011.

This shows the sources of this material.

…………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………

Are certain people at the CARB trying to hide something? Why
does their Public Information Officer, whose job is to answer
questions from the public, refuse to answer questions about
missing data? Why does he obfuscate the truth by referring me
to documents that don’t answer the question? Why does one
of their division chiefs response not make sense?
How is it that data released to only a select few magically makes
the problem go away? Why don’t they post this new data on
their website? All their answers so far only leave me with more
questions.
Again, there are hundreds, maybe thousands of other scientific
confirmations of chemtrail toxins available. I have left those
out in favor of only the most reputable data. Although the next
logical subject would be the health effects of exposure to
chemtrail toxins, I do not feel the need to write about that.
Aside from the fact that it is difficult to prove; I don’t need to
tell you that. I don’t need to tell you that breathing particulate
toxins all day and night is bad for you. I don’t need to tell you
that adding to the myriad of toxins in our food, water and
air is bad for us. We know it is. There are many scientific
papers supporting this position, but it is just common sense.
We need to reduce the amount of toxins in our ecosystem,
not increase them.

Conclusions:

There are fleets of jumbo jet aircraft which have been retrofitted
to spray megatons of toxic substances over populations in most
Western countries. They swarm over different areas at different
times. The planes are flown by remote control because pilots are
a liability.
It is common knowledge that jumbo jets can be flown as drones.
It is a m-litary operation directed from an unknown location, but
I speculate that it is conducted (at least in America and Canada)
from N-RAD command at P-terson AFB, Co-orado Springs, CO
under direction of a Western intelligence agency such as the
C.-.A..
There has been speculation about chemtrails being produced by
additives in the jet fuel of commercial passenger airliners. I do
not believe this is the case. The mechanical problems would be
insurmountable. Spiking the jet fuel with particulate matter
would damage jet engines. Spiking the jet fuel would also
greatly limit the variety and quantity of materials used.

The reasons why are not clear. Their cover story of saving us
all from Global Warming is too thin to be the real reason.
Speculative reasons are: depopulation, making us dependent
upon chemtrail resistant G-O seeds and crops, mi-itary
surveillance purposes, facilitation of the H.A.A.R.P. w-apon,
facilitation of Project Bl-e Beam, the hiding of celestial events,
and others. The most logical reason, depopulation, is almost
too dark for my good mind to accept.
I speculate chemtrail spraying operations are funded by the
citizenry of Western nations through their central b-nks; most
notably the U-ited States Fe-eral Reserve Bank.
You and I are being sprayed. Your family and mine are being
sprayed. Your friends and mine are being sprayed. Our entire
ecosystem and every living thing therein are being destroyed.
The chemtrail phenomenon is nothing short of genocide.
Whether or not that was the intention, that is exactly what it is.
I have now proven to you that chemtrails are real. Do not live
in denial. Denial equals d-ath. Our collective ignorance is
what is k-lling this society. Ignorance causes chemtrails.
I ask that you reverse this trend. Ask the questions. Demand
answers. I have armed you with the verifiable truth; now go
out there and shake the trees.
Call and write your local office of: the Federal A-iation
Administration, the Environmental Pr-tection Agency, the Bay
Area Air Quality M-nagement District, the California Air
Res-urces Board, the National Oceanogr-phic and Atmospheric
Administration, the Office of Environmental H-alth Hazard
Assessment, the Department of To-ic Substances Control,
ALL your gov-rnment representatives, talk radio shows, and
television stations. You are the one you have been waiting for.
Thank you.

Notes:

“Chemtrails Confirmed” by William Th-mas (book) 2004 Bridger
House Publishers
U.S. Patent #5003186 Stratospheric W-lsbach Seeding for
Reduction of Global Warming 1991
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the weather 2025 (Air
Fo-ce research paper) 1996
Aviation and the Global Atmosphere (Intergovernmental P-nel
on Climate Change report) 1999
Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and
Un-ertainty (report by The U.K. Royal Society) 2009
The Regulation of G-oengineering (British House of Commons
/ U.S. House of Rep-esentatives Science and Technology
Committee report) 2010
Unilateral Geoengi-eering: Non-technical Briefing Notes for
a Workshop at the Council on Foreign Relations, Washington
DC, May 05, 2008
Geoengineer-ng Cost Analysis by Aurora Flight Sciences
(report) 2010
Space Preserv-tion Act of 2001 H.R. 2977
Resolution in Support of the Space Preservation Act and the
Space Preservation Treaty to Permanently Ban the
W-aponization of Space (2002) City of Berkeley Resolution
no. 61744
“What in the World Are They Spraying”? by Michael Murphy,
Paul Witt-nberger and G. Edward Griffin (video) 2010 Truth
Media Productions
Aerosol Crimes by Clifford Carnicom (video) 2005
carnicom.com
Available for free on YouTube
Websites:

airc-ap.org
geoengineeringwatch.org
carnicom.com
coalitionagainstgeoengineering.org
arizonaskywatch.com
arb.ca.gov
azdeq.gov

Part 5 of 5.

John Winston. johfw@mlode.com